After Zora Neale Hurston wrote Their Eyes Were Watching God, her writing credibility and career quickly went downhill due harsh critiquing of her work. She ended up dying in poverty and obscurity in a nursing home because she was so deeply discredited by the critics. The harsh critique of Their Eyes Were Watching God inevitably ruined Hurston’s writing career, but were the criticisms fair or even correct? One would hope that they would be if they destroyed her career, but research shows that they weren’t very well founded.
One of Hurston’s greatest critics was Richard Wright, a civil rights activist and writer. Wright used his writing as a means of expounding on the evils of racism. Hurston’s book contained scenes that went against Wright’s philosophy of showing White cruelty towards African Americans. Scenes, like the one where the protagonist is beaten by her husband, seemed to back up White stereotypes of African Americans in Wright’s opinion (Jack).
Wright wanted writing to be propaganda to end racism in the US, which is not a bad thing. However his harsh criticism of Hurston for depicting what many would consider to be the truth about the African American woman’s life at the time could be considered questionable at best.
Now we can look back on the book without the turbulence of the civil rights movement and see that it has gone from a failure to a success. It is now considered to be a very well written book that is not bias in any way. Looking back, one could defiantly say that many of the things that Wright said about Hurston’s book were unfair judgments, and not worth the collapse of her writing career.
Jack, Grace, “Zora Neale Hurston (1891-1960),” www.library.csi.cuny.edu, December 7, 1998. April 13, 2011. Web